|
Introduction
Ancient Tamils from the time of
their migration, probably from the Indus valley, to the
south of India did not keep chronological records of
their history. All available evidence of our past had
been gathered from anthropological evidence and other
artifacts left behind. Even at the height of Tamil
civilisation, the Chola period, detailed records were
not kept. Most of the history has been reconstructed
from stone inscriptions.
In contrast when the motive for record keeping is driven
by Religious fanaticism detailed chronological records
were kept by many civilisations. There are a number of
examples. Jews kept detailed records and these survive
as the old testament of the bible. Similarly the
Buddhist priests in Ealam kept their version of the
history in the form of Mahavamsa and Culavamsa. Like the
Bible there is evidence to suggest that these were
written long after the events described took place.
Therefore these cannot be considered as accurate records
of the events. These were written by priests who mainly
tried to convey a religious message using the events to
illustrate the importance of the Buddhist religion,
hence a very biased version. The description of the
events had a very heavy religious flavor and the history
was modified to glorify those kings who patronised and
supported Buddhism and those who did not were portrayed
as "bad kings". There was also a tendency to remain
silent on the issues which did not portray Buddhism or
the Sinhalese race in a favorable light.
Tamils who were inhabitants of Ealam from the ancient
times and the Tamil invaders from Tamil Nadu in South
India were despised, and were always portrayed in the
most unfavourable light possible. De Silva expresses the
same sentiments when he states “The Mahavamsa and its
continuation Culavamsa were the work of Bhikkus and,
naturally enough were permeated by a strong religious
bias, and encrusted with miracle and invention. The
central theme was the historic role of the Island as a
bulwark of Buddhist civilisation, and in a deliberate
attempt to underline this, it contrives to synchronise
the advent of Vijaya with the parinabbana ( the passing
away) of Buddha.”
In spite of this silence, Mahavamsa and its continuation
Culavamsa provides adequate clues to a strong Tamil
presence in the Island of Ealam from the ancient times
probably well before the arrival of the Sinhalese race.
The aim of this paper is to reconstruct the history of
Tamils in Ealam and to outline the origin of the Jaffna
Kingdom. It can only be a brief summary which will give
a glimpse of the glorious past. The discussions have to
be left for further work as space does not favor a
detailed analysis here.
Ancient History
Presence of Tamils in ancient
Ealam has to be surmised as Mahavamsa, although does not
mention it, gives clues in that it refers to the
ministers of King Vijaya went to the City of Madura to
woo the daughter of the Pandu King for their Lord.
Not only this indicates a strong suggestion of links
between the Sinhala race and Tamils at a very early
stage, but the Buddhist chronicle even goes as far as to
suggest that the first king of the Sinhala had a Tamil
wife. In addition in the earlier years where Mahavamsa
is vague and the details probably not accurate there was
evidence of Tamil Kings ruling the Sinhala race. There
is evidence that in 177BC Two Tamil Kings usurped power
at Anuradhapura and ruled for twenty two years to be
followed ten years later by another, Elara who
maintained himself in power for a much longer period -
forty four years.
Mudaliyar Rasanayagam
following detailed research into ancient history
including analysing the ancient Tamil Literature
concluded that a Naga Kingdom existed in Jaffna in
fifteenth century BC, the period generally allotted to
the events described in the Mahavamsa. He also in his
conclusions stated “in spite of the reticence of the
Mahavamsa, very probably intentional, it will be clearly
seen that for a thousand years after the advent of
Vijaya, the principality in the North existed
undisturbed, while the central power at Anuradhapura
passed through several changes of dynasties and several
storms of conquest”.
There is evidence from archeological investigations
conducted at Pomparippu in the North West of the Island
in 1956 and 1957 of a culture which bears some
resemblance to the South Indian Megalithic culture;
the similarities are most noticeable in the
Adichchanallur site across the water in South India. The
Adichchanallur site is considered to belong to Tamil
culture. There fore there is strong archeological
evidence for the presence of Tamils in Ealam in 300 B.C
in the North West of the Island.
De Silva recognises that several Kingdoms existed at
that period in Ealam and the dynasty at Anuradhapura
being one of them. He states
“The account of these events in the Mahavamsa is at once
too bold in its outlines and too simplistic in
narration. While Mahavamsa treats all kings of Sri Lanka
since the mythical Vijaya as rulers of the whole Island,
the inscriptional evidence points to a quite different
situation, with the Anuradhapura kingdom - tradition
attributes its foundation to Pandukabhaya, the third
king of the Vijayan dynasty - merely the strongest, if
that, among several in the Northern plain and in the
Malaya and Rohana regions, as well as in other parts of
the country”.
It could be concluded that Tamils were a well
established race in Ancient Ealam at least by 300 B.C.
They probably had their own kingdom as research appear
to indicate. It is regrettable that they did not leave a
permanent record to prove this fact.
The Chola period
The Tamils had a continuous
presence in the Island from ancient times. However the
next Key milestone in this chronology is the Chola
period. The imperial Cholas established an empire which
extended from Tamil nadu over the waters as far as the
Malayan peninsula and North as far as the Ganges. Six
hundreds years after the sangam age came to a close, the
Cholas came back again on the stage of Tamil history as
a determining factor. In the middle of 9th
century a Chola chieftain called Vijayalaya ruling small
territory north of the Kaviri established a Chola
dynasty which was to expand into an empire.
Under Rajaraja the Great (983 - 1014) the Cholas
embarked on a aggressive and ambitious programme of
conquest which brought the Sinhalese Kingdom under
direct rule: the Rajarata, the heartland of the
Sinhalese kingdom was attached to the Chola empire.
Rajaraja’s son Rajendra in 1017 AD began the total
reduction of the Island. The whole Island was brought
under Chola rule. In the course of this expedition Chola
captured the crown of the kings of Ceylon and those of
their queens. A powerful army seized Sinhalese warriors
, the wife of the king, his transport etc.; the queen
and the daughter of the defeated king did not escape
imprisonment.
A significant change introduced by the Cholas was the
decision to shift the Capital from Anuradhapura to
Pollanaruva, which subsequently became the Capital for
the Sinhalese Kings as well.
The Jaffna Kingdom
Before during and after the
Chola period the Tamils of Ealam became increasingly
conscious of their ethnicity, which they sought to
assert in terms of culture and religion. Thus the Tamils
of Ealam became sources of support for South Indian
invaders.
Mudaliyar Rasanayagam maintains that from fourth century
AD to eighth century AD there were Kings in Jaffna who
ruled independently during some periods and at other
times under the Kings in Anuradhapura.
He also states that from the eighth century AD Kalinga
King Ukkirasingan and his descendants ruled some times
independently and at other times under the Cholas. The
historical validity of these statements remains to be
confirmed.
Thirteenth century was the period of Pandyan revival in
South India. Under the Pandyan king Maravarman
Kulasekharan (AD 1268 - AD 1308) armies were led by one
Arya Chakravarthi who conquered the Sinhalese armies and
brought the tooth relic of the Buddha from Ceylon to
Madurai.
The history around this period is confused by the only
recorded South East Asian invasion by a petty King from
Malay peninsula Chandrabhanu of Tambaralinga. However it
is well known that Ariyachakravarti the leader of the
Pandyan Army of invasion was installed as a ruler of
Jaffna. When the Pandyan empire in turn collapsed as a
result of Muslim inroads into South India, Jaffna became
an independent Kingdom under Aryachakravartis.
In the second half of the fourteenth century the
fortunes of the sinhalese were on decline. Jaffna under
the Aryachakravartis was much the most powerful kingdom
in the Island. As Sinhala power declined the Tamils
moved southwards to exact tribute from the southwest and
central regions. By the middle of the fourteenth century
the Jaffna kingdom had effective control over the
northwest coast up to Puttalam. After an invasion in
1353, part of four Korales came under Tamil rule and
thereafter, over the next two decades they probed into
the Matale district and naval forces were dispatched to
the west coast as far south as Panadura. The Jaffna
Kingdom was poised for the establishment of Tamil
supremacy over Srilanka, and were foiled in this
primarily because it was soon embroiled with the
powerful Vijayanagar empire in a grim struggle against
the latter’s expansionist ambitions across Palk straits.
|